“When all is said and done, we won’t remember the words of our enemies but the silence of our so-called friends” – Martin Luther King
When there’s something strange in your neighbourhood – and it don’t look good (i.e. 9/11 type false-flag events), who ya gonna call? – Ghostbusters? Truthers? Politicians? Clerics? …WHO?!!
Can we trust politicians to help?
Both [political] parties are so thoroughly corrupt that they have become extremely dangerous to the American people. Both foreign-controlled entities ought to be dissolved post haste before they completely destroy the nation. How can such a categorical conclusion be made about the American two-party system?
Because both political parties harbor numerous powerful members and high-ranking officials who were directly involved in the U.S.-directed, false flag terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. There are even more members of each of the two main parties who continue to participate in the pervasive and preplanned cover-up of the 9/11 crimes against humanity, as they have done for nearly 15 years.
For the uninitiated that fastidiously planned cover-up was greatly advanced by the 9/11 Commission Report.
Without question the official 9/11 Commission Report, formally known as the “Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States”, represents the most unsupported, contrived and ridiculous work of fiction ever produced by the US Federal Government. In fact, it represents the most implausible conspiracy theory in USA history, one that was foisted on the American people, as well as on the world-at-large. The 9/11 Commission Report details a conspiracy theory so far-fetched and full of pre-meditated fabrications that one is forced to ask the question:
“If 19 Arabs with box-cutters in hand did not perpetrate this Crime of the Millennium – under the direction of a man in a cave in Afghanistan – then who might have had the incentive, as well as the extraordinary capability, to perpetrate such an audacious attack?”
(Source: 9/11 Commission Report: The Most Ridiculous Conspiracy Theory Of All Time)
Can we trust ‘truthers’ to help?
It will take ‘truthers’ a decade and a half to solve nothing, ignore all questions, and try to “burn” each other as shills of COINTELPRO ‘intelligence’ – and it also seems that it will be a cold day in hell before our religious leaders ever speak up for 9/11 truth. Various so-called ‘truther’s are still refusing to consider Steve De’ak’s evidence – people like Gordon Duff, Jim Fetzer, David Griscom, Ian Greenhalgh etc. have all stated that his evidence is too inconsequential and, to date, they’ve blankly refused to engage in conversation with him about it. Will such ‘truthers’ continue to dismiss his 9/11 Crash Test evidence – discarding it like broken class, or will they put aside their egos and learn to be more open-minded? Only time will tell if Steve can break the spell set upon them – that keeps them in wilful ignorance of all the evidence – even if it comes just from your Average Joe, grandpa blogger, layperson!
Ian Greenhalgh dismisses the value of Steve De’ak’s 9/11 Crash Test by e-mailing the following statement :
“…the purpose of people like Mr De’ak is to waste people’s time on trivial minutiae and this keep them away from anything of significance, that’s one of the big reasons why, 15 years on, the general public remains largely confused about 9-11 – the hordes of De’aks, Stephen Jones’, Simon Shacks etc that publish so much obfuscatory information. Loose Change the documentary is the prime example – watch it and you will be left with two overriding feelings – that we were not told the truth and being absolutely and utterly confused by the whole thing.”- Ian Greenhalgh
Steve De’ak replies to Ian’s dismissal of his work as follows:
“Trivial minutiae should be easy to get rid of so that you beacons of righteousness can continue on with your investigation. As I have been reminded repeatedly, I am nobody that nobody pays attention to so I’m not doing a very good job of leading the opposition. I marvel at how you lump me in with Stephen Jones and Simon Shack, and you even bring up Loose Change as if the evidence I bring to the table is ever even addressed by any of them. As an outcast to the truth movement I can’t help but notice that you insiders have squandered 15 years. Maybe it’s time to look at the minutiae, regardless how trivial you think it is.” – Steve De’ak
Stephen Phillips – a rising ‘truther’ star, argues as follows:
…I just wish the long asked-for engagement on how we might best understand the admittedly non-intuitive post-strike damage to the facades of both towers. I don’t think anyone here is trying to explain the impact damage away as merely sophisticated explosive charges, as some have desperately proposed. So this is a strong binding element, as I see it. Even as an intellectual exercise, it offers real appeal (I would have thought).
Steve De’ak makes a definite proposal, including specific hardware, and instead of being corrected or challenged with ‘higher knowledge’, he is accused of all manner of things, and basically called a dunderhead, which is not at all how I have sized him up. I don’t feel ‘so stupid’ myself, to tell the truth, yet I permitted myself to buy the official story (flame-proof passport accepted) for more than thirteen years. How much disdain I would have had heaped upon me, prior to my epiphany.
One of the things that so inflames us, that can see something of the dimensions of this radical crime, is the soullessness of the perpetrators. If we end up having nothing to offer ostensible colleagues than insults and insinuation, it seems like we may as well join with the Darkness, and be done with it.
David Griscom replies to Stephen’s above e-mail as follows:
“Stephen, you mean well, and I particularly like the last part of your last sentence:
“If we end up having nothing to offer ostensible colleagues than insults and insinuation, it seems like we may as well join with the Darkness, and be done with it.”
Please note that I myself never use insults or insinuation. And in the present context, I propose that anyone using such insults and insinuation should be given less credence than those who don’t.
As a corollary, if you should ever read a scientific paper, you would see how the authors(s) ran their experiments, what the author(s) conclude from their studies, and sometimes suggestions as to what their scientist readers might do to extend their work. This is why science has been so successful.
Conversely, if a layman ignorant of science arbitrarily decides that he/she correctly understands, for example, what brought down the Twin Towers, this person should be taken with a grain of salt …particularly if he/she uses insults and insinuation to get other laypersons to believe that he/she is right. What you really need are proven scientists.
Please take this into account in the future, even if you know no more about science than mapped out above.” – David Griscom
Steve De’ak believes that David Griscom is too busy boasting about his academic qualifications – at the expense of considering his valuable 9/11 Crash Test evidence – Although David is an expert in the “Glass and Optical Materials Division” – he appears to be treating the evidence of his fellow ‘truthers’ just like worthless broken glass. He boast thus:
“…for the past 50 years I have been advancing physics. This has won me a number of prizes including the latest: the top prize of the Glass and Optical Materials Division of the American Ceramic Society. It is called the “2016 Stookey Lecture of Discovery Award”, requiring me to be the lead speaker at the GOMD Annual Meeting this May in Madison WI. Approximately 250 other members spoke after me.” – David Griscom
Steve replies to David Griscom’s dismissal of his work as follows:
I am a nobody. I have no letters after my name, and I have no followers that I am aware of, therefore the ignorance of truthers can be attributed to the leaders of the movement, of which I am not one.
Perhaps it takes a layperson to teach the experts, but you have to want to learn. Any child who has ever run a stick against a picket fence is an expert on the damage. Parallel columns only damaged on one side and in one direction (not the direction of the wing) can only mean that they were struck on that side.
If you would like to debate the impact evidence, lets go. You can flaunt your credentials and ridicule me all you like. After it becomes clear that a jet wing of any kind couldn’t have done the deed we can move on to why your shock wave theory is absurd and inconsistent with all the evidence of removed bolts and floors.
As far as who is the “Emperor’s New Clothes,” you would be more of one of the Emperor’s duplicitous advisers, while I’m the child calling bullshit. – Steve De’ak
Please don’t dismiss Steve De’ak’s 9/11 evidence like worthless broken class – this is a race for truth finding not for displaying ones egotistical ignorance! There are no “winners” in this game of unravelling the Crime of the Millennium.
“Broken Class” – A musical video – song by Sia dedicated to Steve De’ak: