The 9/11 Commission Report details a conspiracy theory so far-fetched and full of pre-meditated fabrications that one is forced to ask the question:
“If 19 Arabs with box-cutters in hand did not perpetrate this Crime of the Millennium – under the direction of a man in a cave in Afghanistan – then who might have had the incentive, as well as the extraordinary capability, to perpetrate such an audacious attack?”
(Source: 9/11 Commission Report: The Most Ridiculous Conspiracy Theory Of All Time)
After all these years, the world is still expected to believe that one aged, deathly sick old man living in a cave in Afghanistan, somehow managed to completely shut down the entire U.S. military defence force to enable jet fuel to completely “dustify” the Twin Towers in mere minutes. Thus allowing the unholy, lethal marriage between jet fuel and tower office fires to allegedly bring down concrete reinforced steel – which were designed to withstand such a plane impact anyway – so what went horribly wrong?
Pentagon Smoke on 9/11 compared to a Russian military smoke machine “How does a smoke machine work? A smoke machine, in its simplest terms, is a heating element which …
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2015
by Dennis Cimino (with Jim Fetzer)
“Frank Legge paid special attention to a prominent piece of fuselage, which had come from a Boeing 757–not one that had hit the Pentagon on 9/11, but one that had crashed in Cali, Columbia, in 1995”–Jim Fetzer
They attempt to demonstrate that a Boeing 757, designed as “Flight 77”, hit the building and caused the death of 125 Pentagon personnel as well as its passengers and crew. But no passengers or crew died in a plane that did not crash.
What did and did not happen at the Pentagon has become a source of immense controversy within the 9/11 research community, which I have found difficult to appreciate, since books by Thierry Meysson about the Pentagon, 9/11: The Big Lie (2003) and Pentagate (2003)–were the first serious studies of 9/11 I read and convincing that no plane had hit the building. “What didn’t happen at the Pentagon”, for example, was published by rense.com in 2009 and then republished in my own blog in 2010. And when Gordon Duff invited me to write for Veterans Today, my first article, “Seven Questions about 9/11”, published in 2011, also focused on the Pentagon.
Among the points I made is that the official trajectory–of a Boeing 757 traveling over 500 mph and flying low enough to take out a series of lampposts–is neither aerodynamically nor physically possible. Such an aircraft at that speed could not have come closer than 60′ or even 80′ of the lawn because of (what is known as) downwash. And had a plane encountered a series of lampposts, the effects on a plane traveling over 500 mph hitting stationary lampposts would be the same as if the plane had been stationary and hit by lampposts traveling over 500 mph: its wings would have broken open, its fuel would have exploded and it would have careened on fire across the lawn…
The below music video by Sia “Fire Meets Gasoline” is about the alleged “unholy marriage” between the burning office fires within the Twin Towers and plane jet fuel – from the obviously fake planes merging into the towers like a hot knife cuts through butter – all thanks to the U.S. Military air defence force standing down and doing absolutely NOTHING to prevent it!