9/11 forensic experts favour Michael Jackson over 9/11 victims!

 

Many 9/11 ‘truthers’ are very confused as to why Dr. Richard Shepherd has not yet produced any forensic pathology reports for 9/11 victims, but has instead done detailed forensic reports and T.V. shows giving details of Michael Jackson’s death.  

Dr. Shepherd is the leading forensic pathologist in the UK. He was sent to New York to advise on the management of UK fatalities following 9/11, and to Bali following the bomb attack on the Sari Club. He was also the forensic pathological expert for the Bloody Sunday Inquiry and the Inquiry and Inquest into the deaths of Diana, Princess of Wales and Mr Dodi Al Fayed. He has recently provided the Attorney General with a review of the forensic pathological aspects of the death of Dr David Kelly, a scientist employed by the British Ministry of Defence and formerly a United Nations weapons inspector in Iraq.

 

Dr. Shepherd is currently fronting a tabloid television series entitled “Autopsy: The Last Hours Of…” It is a show in which he gets paid to dissect the minutiae of the post-mortems of famous dead people. It is surely the apex of televisual entertainment. The first episode concerned popstar Michael Jackson. Dr. Shepherd’s previous clients include Rachel Nickell, MI6 Spy Gareth Williams, television presenter Jill Dando and UK victims of 9/11.

 

9/11 ‘truthers’ are now demanding that Dr. Richard uses his professional expertise a little more productively, and stop his infatuation with celebrities – seemingly preferring them to 9/11 victims!  

 

Now that Gordon Duff has referenced the use of nuclear weapons on 9/11 in London and Bali, ‘truthers’ are demanding that Richard reveals some information on his studies of 9/11 victims in Bali, or New York. Even die-hard fans of Michael Jackson think Richard has gone a little too far – by totally ignoring 9/11 victims in preference to study of Michael Jackson. Dr. Richard is rumoured to hate all 9/11 victims because he believes they don’t have any musical talent at all, and so he couldn’t care less if they were nuked to death, or if they’d all choked to death eating their lunch.   However, Simon Shack is now seeking to persuade Dr. Richard to not let the love of music cloud his judgement on 9/11 truth.   Simon is a prime example of how a musician can successfully combine musical talent with study of 9/11 truth. Simon Shack appeals to Jim Fetzer to call out all 9/11 medical experts (such as Charles Hirsch) – to help shed some light on the number of people who died on 9/11 – He states: “the 9/11 victims were mostly vaporized” – as claimed by NY Chief Medical Examiner Charles Hirsch : http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2099540#p2099540

 

Simon Shack would like to see a debate between Charles Hirsch and Jim Fetzer:

 

“I propose a ‘truce’ of sorts between Dr Fetzer and myself – suggesting that he would invite on his show a man (Charles Hirsch – a man about the same age as Fetzer) whose 9/11 experience we are ALL interested to hear. This, in the spirit of intelligent collaboration between our respective efforts to unveil the truth of 9/11. I will be waiting for Fetzer’s response to this proposal of mine – which I consider a constructive step towards sharpening our focus on the relevant individuals who need to be approached and interviewed about their 9/11 experience.” [ Source: Frankly Speaking ]

 

However, Jim Fetzer has contradicted Gordon Duff’s view that nukes where used on 9/11, in Bali and London by stating:

 

“Nick Kollerstrom, the leading expert on 7/7, is a friend and associate of mine. To the best of my knowledge, there is no good reason to think that 7/7 involved the use of nukes at all. That sounds VERY farfetched.”

 

This statement by Jim Fetzer contradicts Gordon’s research article:

 

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/06/putin-confirms-911-was-an-inside-job-russian-intel-leak-2976328.html –  which states:

 

“According to a retired FXX agent specializing in Israeli counter intel: The type of nuclear devices used on 911 were a modified version of the W-54 nuclear artillery shells that were covertly provided to the Israelis between 1988 and 1998 from US surplus stockpiles illegally exported during the Bush/Clinton era…

Fallout would be minimal and located to within ground zero range only. Radiation would drop to acceptable levels within 72 hrs. after the blast. Most fall out was trapped in the cement dust thus causing all of the recent cancer deaths that we are now seeing in NYC amongst first responders…

All of the micro nukes used by the Israelis are re-manufactured W-54 type series devices.  These devices were used in the Bali bombing and the London bombing and in Japan on their reactors. (Editor’s note: Nuclear weapon use in Bali confirmed) Also used in Damascus, Iraq and Afghanistan by the US. (Editor’s note: Multiple confirmation including site samples.)”

 

falling-manMany 9/11 ‘truthers’ now site the legal principle “false in one, false in all” to question Gordon’s entire 9/11 nuke hypothesis – because if even his close colleagues don’t agree on where, or when nukes where used in ‘false-flag’ events – such as those on 9/11, 7/7 and in Bali, then why should anyone else?   9/11 Truthers are also afraid that Gordon Duff is trying to ‘sex-up’ his V.T. nuke education series with use of false “falling man” imagery:  “FALLING MAN” – the phony jumpers, in much the same way the neocons ‘sexed up’ the evidence of their being WMDs in Iraq. However, Gordon’s devoted “nuke theory” followers such as Jim Fetzer, Kevin Barrett and Don Fox say that we should all just believe what Gordon says the Russians are saying. They say they love the Russians because they’re more American than Americans and they wish they had been born Russian too. Kevin Barrett says he wants to totally forget that the Russians kept quiet about the use of 9/11 nukes for over a decade – thus causing the unnecessary deaths of millions of Iraqis and U.S. servicemen/women in a fake “war on terror”. He believes that now that they’re speaking out, it is “better late than never” – so they’re all as sweet as apple pie now!  However, Professor Walter Veith disagrees and states that all 9/11 ‘truthers’ are “complete morons” to trust the Russians.   He states that the Russians are only speaking out now because they want to establish their much awaited Russian/UN Luciferian New World Order, and so diminish any sense of freedom the Americans ever thought they had.   He explains how the Russian constitution is identical to the U.N. constitution in his lecture “The UN and the Occult Agenda”:

 

Gordon Duff fans are still not convinced and now even think that Iraq still benefited somehow from 9/11, even though they have been bombed back into the Stone Age by the U.S.A. One top commentator (Michael Rose · Top Commenter · Auckland University, NZ) on Veterans Today : http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/06/10/wmd-man/ states:

 

“Did Editor Barratt fail to read Gordon Duff’s article on US nuclear proliferation last week or what? Wasn’t Iraq high on the list of countries which “benefited” from Washington allowing Friends of Zion to steal half the Los Alamos atomic armory and sell it secretly to all and sundry?”

 

Gordon Duff firmly believes that many countries benefited from the sale of mini-nukes, stating:

 

“Illegal distribution of US nuclear material to foreign allies was not limited to Israel. Virtually all NATO allies were in on this scam too. Dick Cheney was the bad guy on this one. Bush2/Cheney traded nuclear pits to foreign country as IOU’s in order to get what they wanted. Tom Countryman a well-known Israeli operative is curiously now in charge of N.N.P. at the State Department under Obama.(?) He was put there by Ram Emanuel.”

 

Michael Jackson’s family state that although Michael was indeed a very talented musician, they really do think that forensic experts (like Robert Shaler and Dr. Richard Shepherd) should make more of an effort to focusing their attention on finding nuclear radiation evidence in what remains of the 9/11 victims. After all, if they were killed by nuclear radiation, then there must be at least some tiny traces of this in the body tissue, or bone samples that were found:

 

“Many of the bodies of the passengers aboard the two airplanes that struck the buildings were consumed by burning jet fuel, leaving only traces of DNA, much of it so damaged that it was impossible to read. Few bodies were found intact. Most of the human remains culled from the vast wreckage at Ground Zero were little more than tiny fragments of charred tissue and bone. The volume was overwhelming. Robert Shaler, who headed the city’s Department of Forensic Biology and was a leader of the identification effort, worried his lab would be paralyzed if it tried to identify every piece. At first, they decided they would only attempt to test samples that were “the size of a thumb or larger,” he says. But when they saw how small many of the fragments were, they changed their minds. “If we were really going to make an honest effort,” Shaler says, “we had to do everything that came along.

Shaler and his colleagues at the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner gave weekly updates to family members of the victims, reporting how many of the dead had been identified and reassuring them that the city was doing everything to identify their loved ones. But the families weren’t only concerned with their own dead. In meeting after meeting, Shaler says, relatives would ask about the hijackers. Had the scientists identified any of their remains?

“They did not want the terrorists mixed in with their loved ones,” says Shaler. The families said, “These people were criminals and did not deserve to be with them.” The families asked for the remains of the hijackers to be separated out and kept someplace else. Shaler shared their frustration. Now 66, his hair and beard a grandfatherly white, Shaler says he could not always separate his duties a scientist from his own emotions: a little more than a year into the investigation, he suffered a heart attack. At the early meetings, he told the families he didn’t think it would be possible to sort out the remains; by the spring of 2002, Shaler and his staff of 105 scientists had yet to identify any of the New York hijackers. “I thought we’d never find remains from anyone on the planes,” he says. But he promised to try.

The blunt reality is that no matter how fastidious their efforts, the scientists will never fully sort the victims from the hijackers. The fragments are too small, too ruined and too scattered for bodies to be restored in their entirety…”

http://www.newsweek.com/terror-remains-911-hijackers-78327

***********

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Truther Musical

A '9/11 Truther' Musical Production

Discover

A daily selection of the best content published on WordPress, collected for you by humans who love to read.

The Daily Post

The Art and Craft of Blogging

The WordPress.com Blog

The latest news on WordPress.com and the WordPress community.

%d bloggers like this: