What Country Is Next on the NWO Agenda? Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, & Syria? The Truth Is Staggering
The war on terror is a scam. It is based on bogus premises and propagated by those who maintain to fight it. The so-called ‘Islamic State’ is completely backed up and backed by the Western military alliance and America’s allies in the Persian Gulf. Luckily, more folks are starting to wake up to this truth, and are recognizing that a enormous propaganda campaign is right now underway which expects to persuade the public into thinking in and fearing a ‘terrorist’ enemy. As former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook points out, this tactic is meant “to drive TV watchers to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the United States.”
If we take some time to let this sink in, the ramifications become quite clear: the Western military alliance is developing and perpetuating (in various different ways) this war on terror, while at the same time claiming to be fighting for our freedom by going after these alleged terrorists. 9/11 was the turning point, and polls currently show that almost half (if not more) of Americans consider that 9/11 was an inside job, designed to justify the infiltration of the Middle East. Ever since that day, countless innocent individuals have lost their lives fighting against something which their own countries proceed to support.
“We are dealing with a criminal undertaking at a global level. . . . The global war on terrorism is a fabrication, a big lie and a crime against humanity.”
The statement above was made at the International Conference on the New World Order, and shows a huge concern that continues to attract attention from intellects and other influential folks around the world. In other words, a ‘secretive’ group of elitists have taken control of the planet, and they continue to infiltrate and wreak havoc on countries to set up this New World Order. This is precisely what president Eisenhower warned us about when he warned us that we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence by the military industrial complex, and when he argued that the “potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist.”
This power has virtually taken over the Middle East, and over the years more people continue to query why violent intervention was necessary in these countries. Thinking about the infiltration of these countries was based on phony premises, the evident answer is, it was not. This power totally controls the United States and allied political systems.
“There exists a shadowy government with its own Air Force, its own Navy, its own fundraising mechanism, and the ability to pursue its own ideas of the national interest, free from all checks and balances, and free from the law itself.”
– Senator Daniel K. Inouye (source)
A fairly recently posted email that belongs to Hitlery Clinton verified this widespread duplicity, exposing that the invasion of Libya was less about protecting the people from a dictator and more so about acquiring money, power, and oil, and stopping African economic sovereignty.
Before 2011, Libya had economic independence, with its own water, food, oil, and money – even its own state-controlled bank.
So, who’s next? Based on retired four-star General Wesley Clark, it could be Iran. Here’s what he stated in an interview with Democracy Now almost 10 years ago.
Iran? For some time, Western media has been raising issues over Iran’s nuclear program, producing an atmosphere of fear amongst the public, and judging by the thoughts of Wesley Clark, Iran might be the military’s next target. In order for this to materialize, conflicts like those in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria will need to present themselves in Iran. And we can already observe it developing.
The United States continues to demonize Iran in the media and inflict more sanctions on the country, no doubt in an attempt to stain the country’s reputation in the eyes of the Western public. This would make infiltration of the country much easier to justify, and it appears plans are already in the works. As outlined by University of Ottawa’s Dr. Michel Chossudovsky (quoted above):
Humanity is at a dangerous crossroads. War preparations to attack Iran are in “an advanced state of readiness”. Hi tech weapons systems including nuclear warheads are fully deployed.
This military adventure has been on the Pentagon’s drawing board since the mid-1990s. First Iraq, then Iran according to a declassified 1995 US Central Command document.
Escalation is part of the military agenda. While Iran, is the next target together with Syria and Lebanon, this strategic military deployment also threatens North Korea, China and Russia.
All of these pursuits, and the entire New World Order agenda, rely on a heightened national security state – one that reiterates the continuous need for national defense measures to be not only maintained, but elevated. Without a world at war, without the ‘terrorist threat’ that these powers themselves produce, this agenda would not be able to move forward.
The American media, which is indisputably governed by both intelligence and corporate agendas, is constructing a political consensus for war, as they’ve done in the past and carry on to do to this day, dishing out bogus information and propaganda to the masses. World class journalists are already verifying this (and here are 3 great examples).
The power which controls the West is obviously gearing up for another take-over scenario. United States military bases are at this point present all over the world, well positioned to invade wherever they are directed to. These powers will proceed to fabricate crises in order to create a global atmosphere of fear, making folks more likely to concur to their proposed ‘solutions.’ This is precisely how the New World Order moves forward – through ‘legitimized violence’ and ‘justified’ killings. And the first stage to stopping them is awareness.
“With regard to Iran, what is unfolding is the outright legitimization of war in the name of an illusive notion of global security.”
– Prof Michel Chossudovsky